|  Your source for news and events in the Columbia Valley

 Posted in    |  on April 12th, 2013  |  by

Better balance sought for industrial developments

Dear Editor:

Neither Teck nor the B.C. government has denied the well-documented facts reiterated by the recent selenium study quoted in Wildsight and its partners’ media release on the poisoning of the Elk River. B.C. Environment Minister Terry Lake reacted by the afternoon of our release stating that there would be no new coalmines approved in the Elk Valley until a valley-wide plan to manage the cumulative effects of selenium concentrations in the Elk River is developed. This is a welcome announcement.

Though the selenium problem has been growing for decades, British Columbia is still without legal limits to selenium pollution. Until a plan is in place, including enforceable obligations, it would be foolish to expand permitting and the poisoning of a world class river that runs through our communities.

Unfortunately, some of the response from less informed sources suggested that the selenium levels in the river that far exceed water quality guidelines for fish and humans could be tied to “unknown” background levels of selenium.

Nothing could be farther from the truth. The recent study looked at water quality both above the mines and in the Flathead River—both of which run through coal bearing landscapes. These pristine waters showed selenium levels consistently well below water quality guidelines.

The challenge is to reverse the present trend of the increasing poisoning and put enforceable scientifically supported standards in place.

The balance between industrial development and environmental health must be re-established. This will not be achieved until Elk River water quality is again healthy for fish and appropriate environmental mitigation and compensation is effected.

John Bergenske

2 Responses to Better balance sought for industrial developments

  1. Thank you, Wildsight, for standing up.

  2. David Pacey says:

    I know I’m going to shock you John, but I for once whole heartedly agree that enough is enough and agree with Wildsight. When the waters above the mines are free and waters below are not free of selenium in the quantities you state, then the BC Liberal government has done the right thing in putting a moratorium on further develpment adjacent to the river and in the valley UNTIL a solution acceptable to all, is determined and implimented.

    But again, another word of warning to Wildsight: the “facts” better be accurate and true or the credibility of Wildsight will take a further downward spiral. Not just Wildsight, but every other “environmental” group in North America, no matter the source of funding. Would you care to publish the criteria and the results for all to see in the local papers? Please, make very very sure your facts are correct and verifiable, John, by anyone with the scientific know-how.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note: All comments are moderated during regular working hours, your comment will appear once it has been approved. We reserve the right to publish any online comment in the regular newspaper in a section called "Words from the Web". Questions? Call the office at 250-341-6299.