|  Your source for news and events in the Columbia Valley

 Posted in    |  on July 19th, 2013  |  by

Doe killed after hazing attempt goes awry

By Dan Walton
Pioneer Staff

There will be no charges laid after an investigation into the death of a female mule deer.

On Tuesday, July 9th, while a landscaping crew was working on a property on 2nd Avenue near Fort Point, a doe breached the homeowners fence while labourers were on duty.

Speaking with The Pioneer, Invermere Conservation Officer Greg Kruger said that in an attempt to haze the deer off of the property, rocks were meant to be thrown near the deer, but one stone accidentally connected with the deer’s head and brought its life to an end.

The death was immediately reported by a worker from the landscaping crew.

“That was not the desired outcome,” Mr. Kruger said. “The property owners were doing their part to avoid conflicts with the deer by installing the fence all around the property, but this particular doe breached that fence. So these workers were sealing off the breach in the fence to keep deer out for public safety.”

The rock that was used to kill the deer was described by Mr. Kruger as about five to six centimetres wide by four centimetres long.

Mr. Kruguer’s decision not to lay charges came as no surprise to the president of Deer Protection Society of Invermere, Devin Kazakoff, who doesn’t believe all the facts came to surface upon the investigation’s conclusion.

“I have a pretty good idea of what went on, but he can’t use what I have to say because I’m just a third-party,” Mr. Kazakoff said, who spoke with eyewitnesses. “But I completely understand why he came to that conclusion — the eyewitnesses didn’t come forward to the conservation officer.”

Mr. Kruger said that the investigation “basically centred around interviewing those on site at the time, including the individual responsible for throwing the rock.”

Asked if he believed the complete truth had come about during the investigation, he told The Pioneer that it had.

“To date, no one has come forward to contradict the evidence or information that I’ve ascertained.”

During investigations of such nature, prior history of the individual(s) responsible are reviewed.

“Any fish, wildlife, environmental violators are all tracked in our system. We can see if a person’s been dealt with before, and that would be a part of the investigation for sure,” he said, confirming that the man who threw the rock had no previous reports on record.

But while no other incidents involving the man were reported, Mr. Kazakoff isn’t convinced that the ruling was fair.

“I have heard that these deer have been harassed for weeks by the same individuals, throwing rocks and chasing them — and they knew full well that there were does and fawns in that yard. I don’t personally believe that it was an accident, I think maybe they didn’t intend to kill the deer, but they sure intended to throw rocks and harass the deer,” he said. “It’s not legal, it’s not right, and it’s completely unacceptable.”

While hearsay exists to contradict the official story, the property owners (not the landscapers) have reported aggressive deer on site in the past, which prompted the installation of deer-proof fencing.

“The landscapers were trying to haze it out of the open gates when the accident happened and the rock struck it — it was an erroneous throw,” Mr. Kruger said. “When I made contact with that individual responsible, nothing was withheld and the deer was made available for inspection. There was full co-operation.”

Dealing with problematic deer is always a matter of circumstance, Mr. Kruger says.

“There are a number of different things people can do which depend on how each deer will react.”

He said to ensure that the animal has a clear and evident escape route, and evaluate its comfort around humans.

“Throwing sticks and rocks near the animal, but not at it, oftentimes will work. Gauge their actions accordingly.”

But at no time does the Conservation Authority encourage or condone people injuring these animals, he said.

Both Mr. Kruger and Mr. Kazakoff agreed that, during the July 9th incident, which was a circumstance involving a deer that was presenting a threat to the public, the Conservation Authority should have been contacted to deal with the doe.

One Response to Doe killed after hazing attempt goes awry

  1. Theresa Caligiuri says:

    Sticks and stones will break a deer’s bones and faulty claims of “Hazing” won’t do justice for her.

    Did you know that a well-placed stone that measures about five to six centimeters wide by four centimeters long, the size described by Mr. Kruger, to a mule deer’s skull by a normal human male would not kill her but more than likely stun her, and if the claims that “one miss guided stone” happened to hit just right, it would have to be thrown at least at a rate of 50mph, and throwing that hard tells you that there was not intent to just “scare” the doe

    What would have happened if a small child, who is like a deer in the same sense that they do not understand trespassing, equally as innocent, and not responsible for their action, would have stumbled into that back yard? Would the crew have thrown stones at that child, chances are no, at least I would hope not! As stated before that one rock would have had to have been thrown hard and for someone to do that, shows a lack of compassion and sound judgment, not someone I want working with power tools, and heavy equipment in my yard. Then again with us Americans we tend not to overlook crimes against nature and innocent creatures being brutalized and bludgeoned to death. I find it even worse since it was a mother and now has orphaned fawns left to roam, possibly meeting the same fate.

    I understand there is a deer issue in the area that has been meet with an overall crudeness to it, but it seems with some sound thought, a humane solution can be met? A call to a local deer rescue, the conservation office, or the Deer Protection Society of Invermere, which was mentioned in the article, sounds like an amazing first step instead of taking matters into your own hands, or putting stones in your glorified gardeners’ hands.

    I have shared this story with several people where I live in Iowa, they are all shocked, by the lack of penalties or remorse for their actions. Though large herds of deer can do much harm to the neighborhood, yet the injury to the morals of the people who watch innocence met with brutality is of more moment than the loss of crops or shrubbery, so Invermere, where do your morals lie?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Please note: All comments are moderated during regular working hours, your comment will appear once it has been approved. We reserve the right to publish any online comment in the regular newspaper in a section called "Words from the Web". Questions? Call the office at 250-341-6299.