Editorial
‘Glamping’ in Wilmer? Who would’ve ever thought?
Well, someone did and now a glamorous camping resort is being proposed on Westside Road, not far from the Columbia Wetlands.
Now, before you lament that ol’ Grandpappy would role over in his grave, consider the facts of what is being planned by weighing the pros and cons.
In submissions to the RDEK, a number of residents have expressed support for the proposal, ranging from economic spin-offs and increased tourism to wildfire management and environmental stewardship. Some residents have indicated conditional support if the number of accommodation sites is scaled back.
The recent public hearing brought forth a larger contingent of concerns, including negative impacts on wildlife, traffic safety, wetland protection, neighbourhood infringement, wildfire risk, sewer/water impacts, and property values.
In one letter of support, a local resident pointed out the potential for facilitating nature immersion for families, adding that the exposure will “spark a lifelong appreciation for the environment in children.”
In another submission, a resident pointed out that denying the proposal would risk a less controlled form of development (in the future) with the division of land and the erection of private fortresses and “no trespassing” signs.
On the other hand, some residents believe a glamorous campground in Wilmer is totally out of character with the neighbourhood and would threaten the delicate ecosystem of the Columbia Wetlands. No, it’s not “just a swamp.” Critical habitat disturbance by increased human activity is a valid concern that needs to be taken seriously via comprehensive assessments. Any detrimental effects to this ecosystem would be irreversible.
While some argue that Wilmer needs to be kept the way it is — a small, quiet community free from commercialism — others are convinced this proposal (if done right) will lead to many benefits and prove that sensitive ecosystems can co-exist with the human race.
Lyonel Doherty, editor
